Marriage and maintenance
* Pictures in the private sector to preserve evidence may be admissible. The protection of privacy must also behind a weightier interest to resign. As such, here the interest of the defendant is to be considered at a demonstration. LG Köln, AZ: 5 O 160/92
* Detective costs are in maintenance process eligible if one partner conceals the amount of his income. OLG Zweibrücken, AZ: 6WF 117/00
* In the maintenance process are detective costs for the necessary legal defense expenses necessary if the creditor omits labor income, determined in a detective's office, and can be taken from him establish the procedural position change of the debtor. OLG Schleswig, AZ: 15 WF 1592/93
* A divorced woman who lives with her new partner and is supplied fully risked their livelihood. The ex-husband after a year can adjust its payments. OLG Dusseldorf, AZ: 3 UF 147/91
* Detective costs to determine a detectable otherwise, serious misconduct may in proceedings for separation maintenance be recoverable. OLG Stuttgart, AZ: 8WF 96/88
* A woman needs her ex-husband to recover costs for a detective agency. Having witnessed interrogations had brought inconclusive on the question of whether the ex-wife lives in a consensual union with a third party, the retention of a detective agency was required. It has verified that the ex-wife and her new boyfriend were living together, which was eventually influenced the verdict decisively in favor of the ex-husband. In addition to the usual legal costs have the ex-wife therefore also bear the detective the full cost (7,000 EUR), as it had so far acted on the necessary costs that were process-related and in their height - in relation to the longer even a period expected child support payments - were relatively. OLG Koblenz, AZ: 11 WF 70/02
* The very, proven by detectives, moving into the same house is a clear demonstration of the close relationship with the new partner. This is sufficient to adopt a marriage-like partnership and does, in this case, the ex-husband of another to pay maintenance to his ex-wife. OLG Frankfurt, AZ: 1 UF 94/01
|